The official definition of a controversy is an issue that involves a
prolonged public dispute or debate. Controversies usually concern a
matter of opinion and can involve a wide variety of topics including
world history, religion, philosophy, politics, economics, science,
finances, age, gender, and race. In some areas of the world
controversial issues are said to be disruptive to society and are not
discussed in public. In other cultures, people feel it is their duty to
examine all areas of a subject and discuss it in a civilized manner.
Since the invention of the camera, hundreds of controversial pictures
have been taken. This article will examine 10 images that have raised
concern in the media and caused debate across the internet. The list is
not attempting to display the top ten controversial photographs in
history, but will examine a collection of pictures that have not been
featured in similar articles. In any case, I would like to hear your
opinion on the most controversial images in history.
10. The Lost Tucker
The 1948 Tucker sedan is an advanced automobile that was developed by
Preston Tucker and produced in 1948. According to records, only 51
Tucker sedans were made before the business folded. The vehicle’s
design was innovative for the 1940s and was built for safety. The
Tucker was the first car to feature seat belts, safety glass
windshields, and the Cyclops, which was a headlight system that shifted
directions to increase visibility for night driving. In 1949, the
Tucker Corporation was ridiculed by the American media and experienced a
consumer backlash. The company was shut down amidst a scandal of
controversial accusations around stock fraud. In 2011, a 1948 Tucker
sedan was featured on the show It’s Worth What? and received an
estimated value of $1,200,000.
Justin Cole is a man that runs Benchmark Classics in Middleton,
Wisconsin. He claims to own the only unfinished prototype of a Tucker
convertible. The authenticity of the vehicle has been questioned by
classic car collectors from all over the world. Legend holds that the
convertible was a secret, off-the-books prototype known as “Project
Vera,” developed by Preston Tucker and named after his wife. However,
Alex Tremulis, who designed the Tucker sedan, has claimed that the
convertible was not a factory project, official or unofficial. Justin
Cole refers to his convertible as Tucker #57 and says the factory number
of 57 is stamped on the body panels.
In 2010, Justin Cole attempted to sell the Tucker convertible at the
Russo and Steele auction in Scottsdale. The bidding reached a price of
$1.4 million, but didn’t meet the reserve price. The car was also
listed on ebay in 2010, where bidding approached $900,000, but once
again didn’t meet the reserve. The vehicle is still listed for sale on
Benchmark’s website and has a large gallery of photographs. The car
holds a clear Tucker design and clean convertible conversion. The
position of the Tucker Automobile Club of America is that the vehicle
was converted after the company went out of business.
9. Sowoneul Malhaebwa (Genie) Cover
Girls’ Generation is a nine-member South Korean pop girl group formed
in 2007. They are currently the top selling Korean girl band in the
world. In the summer of 2009, the group took part in a controversial
photo shoot with a military theme. One of the pictures from the shoot
was selected for the band’s mini-album cover Sowoneul Malhaebwa (Genie).
Soon after the album’s release, controversy erupted over the cover.
In the picture, a plane can be seen which many people felt was a direct
replica of Japan’s A6M Zero fighter plane, which was used by the
Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service in World War II. People also noticed
that the military outfits, medals, and hats worn by the girls resemble
that of the Third Reich.
In one example, the eagle emblem used on the girls’ hats greatly
resembles the Nazi Party emblem. In response to the accusations, SM
Entertainment stated: “We used military icons on the album cover, but it
was interpreted and understood in a way we didn’t expect, so we are
planning to delete it and put an icon of the South Korean supersonic jet
T-50.” In the future, Girls’ Generation should be more careful about
using images that were taken from Nazi and Kamikaze insignia.
Regardless of the controversy, Sowoneul Malhaebwa (Genie) reached #1
less than 24 hours after it release.
8. Thomas Hoepker’s 9/11 Photo
Thomas Hoepker is a German born photographer and member of Magnum
Photos. On September 11, 2001, Hoepker was in New York when the World
Trade Center was attacked. Hoepker captured hundreds of photos of the
destruction, but one stands out. The photograph shows a collection of
Americans relaxing and enjoying a conversation while the Twin Towers
burn in the background. Hoepker did not publish the image for five
years because he was concerned with the message. In 2006, the picture
caused controversy in the American media. The New York Times published
an article claiming the picture showed America’s failure to learn from
the tragic day, or to change and reform as a nation.
“The young people in Mr. Hoepker’s photo aren’t necessarily callous
(insensitive). They’re just American.” This is a country that likes to
move on, and fast. The people in the picture have responded to the
media by saying that they were in “a profound state of shock and
disbelief.” They have ridiculed Hoepker saying that he took the picture
without permission and in a way that misrepresented their feelings.
Whatever the case, the photo is established as one of the defining
images of 9/11 and remains controversial in the eyes of many people.
7. Sochi Six
At the end of World War II, the United States and Soviet Union
captured a large collection of German secrets, including information on a
German rocket program. The technology sparked the Space Race
(1957-1975) between the United States and the Soviet Union. In each
country, a select group of individuals were chosen as the first
astronauts. In most cases, these people were kept secret from the
public. A good example is the Russian born astronaut Grigori Nelyubov.
Little is known about Nelyubov, but he was likely the third or fourth
person to travel into space before his dismissal from the Soviet space
program in April, 1963, for disorderly conduct. Following his
dismissal, all information regarding Nelyubov’s life was stricken from
the Soviet record.
Grigori Nelyubov’s image was removed from a collection of famous
photographs, including the Sochi Six picture, which shows the top
members of the original class of Soviet cosmonauts. This airbrushing
has led to a large collection of conspiracy theories regarding lost
cosmonauts and unreported space flight. In 1966, Nelyubov committed
suicide. From 1961 to 1972, at least eight former Russian cosmonauts
are known to have died. The Sochi Six picture was officially released
in the 1970s and the deception was only discovered after Russian news
managers lost track of which versions of the picture they had already
published. The fakery has caused some to label the Soviet Union’s
string of space triumphs over the United States in the 1950s and early
1960s as a series of falsifications. I have included the original Sochi
Six photograph before Nelyubov was removed. He is the tallest man in
the picture.
6. Samar Hassan
Chris Hondros was an American Pulitzer Prize-nominated war
photographer. In 2005, he traveled to Iraq in order to cover the war.
On January 18, 2005, Hondros was in Tal Afar when he witnessed a car
that failed to stop at a U.S. checkpoint. U.S. Soldiers feared a
suicide bomber and opened fire on the car killing both parents and
injuring one of their five children. Hondros approached the scene and
captured a picture of 5-year-old Samar Hassan splattered in her parent’s
blood. After the photo was published, it quickly caused controversy
and was spread across the world. Many feel the picture is the most
iconic image of the Iraq War, similar to the naked Vietnamese girl
screaming and running after a napalm attack. The Iraq War delivered few
singular images, partly because it was too dangerous for photographers.
The U.S. military also set strict rules for journalists.
In 2011, Samar Hassan looked at the picture for first time and was
interviewed by the New York Times Middle East. About the incident she
said that her family was in the car because her brother was sick and
that they were returning from the hospital. In 2011, Samar was living
on the outskirts of Mosul in a two-story house with four other families,
mostly relatives. Chris Hondros was quoted about the once in a
lifetime photograph: “Almost every soldier in Iraq has been involved in
some sort of incident like that or another, I would say. Their attitude
about it was grim, but it wasn’t the end of their world.” It was
reported on April 20, 2011, that Chris Hondros and photojournalist Tim
Hetherington were killed by a mortar attack in Misrata while covering
the 2011 Libyan civil war.
5. Mary Moorman JFK Picture
Mary Ann Moorman was a witness to the assassination of U.S. President
John F. Kennedy. She is best known for her photograph that shows JFK a
fraction of a second after being shot in the head. During the event,
Moorman was standing directly across from the grassy knoll, about 15
feet (5 m) from the presidential limousine. Her photograph was taken
approximately one sixth of a second after the bullet’s impact. The
image has caused controversy. Some claim to have identified as many as
four different figures on the grassy knoll. With the most well known
figure being a uniformed police officer named the “badge man.” Others
claim to see Gordon Arnold or a man in a construction hard hat. People
also point to the light color observed over the wall (left side), which
looks like photo doctoring.
The story of Gordon Arnold is an interesting one. In 1978, Gordon
claimed that before the assassination he was twice approached by a
business-suited CIA or Secret Service agent who demanded that he move
from behind the picket fence of the Dealey Plaza grassy knoll. Arnold
claimed that he moved just south of the picket fence and filmed the
assassination with a movie camera. During the event, a bullet passed
extremely close to his left ear and in response Gordon hit the ground.
He was then approached by an armed officer dressed in a Dallas police
uniform. The man kicked Arnold while on the ground and demanded the
movie film. Another man was armed with a rifle and dressed in a Dallas
police uniform. He was wearing yellow lens tinted “shooter’s glasses”
and stood close by crying, shaking, and waving his rifle around.
The Moorman picture has been digitally enhanced for television
documentaries. In the photo, blood and brain fragments can be seen
exploding forward, which contradicts the theory that the shot came from
the front. Moorman’s original photograph was never confiscated by the
FBI and in 2008 she sold it on ebay for $175,000. On the contrary, a
second picture taken by Mary Moorman that shows the sixth-floor window
of the Texas School Book Depository moments before the assassination was
lost. The picture was confiscated by the FBI and never published. It
probably shows Lee Harvey Oswald or anyone who may have been shooting at
the President’s car. Another interesting photograph was taken by
Phillip Willis (number 5) seconds before the fatal head shot. Willis
said he took the picture
after being startled by a gunshot, possibly the first shot. In Willis’
photograph, the grassy knoll can be seen and some have identified the
“black dog man.”
4. 7/7 London Bombings
On the morning of July 7, 2005, four Islamist home-grown terrorists
exploded a series of bombs in quick succession aboard London Underground
trains. In all, 52 people were killed in the attacks. The bombers
(all deceased) were identified as Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad
Tanweer, Germaine Lindsay, and Hasib Hussain. The group was recorded by
CCTV cameras entering Luton station on 7/7. On September 1, 2005, it
was reported that al-Qaeda officially claimed responsibility for the
attacks. However, an official inquiry by the British government
indicated that the tape claiming responsibility had been edited after
July 7, and that the bombers did not have direct assistance from
al-Qaeda.
The lack of facts surrounding the case and its unusual timeline has
led to a collection of conspiracy theories. Some newspaper editorials
in Iran have blamed the bombing on British or American authorities
seeking to further justify the War on Terror, and have claimed that the
plan involved the harassment of Muslims in Europe. There have also been
theories proposed about the attackers, including the suggestion that
they were patsies. One of the theories is centered on a picture that
was taken at Luton station. After researching the photo, a large
collection of people have called it fake.
Some of the problems with the picture include a number of
inconsistencies with the railing in the back of the image. The railing
appears to be moved over the man’s arm and its crossbars do not line up.
The person featured in the right side of the picture has no clear face
and a skinny left leg. The entire picture is developed with extremely
poor quality and three of the terrorist’s faces are unidentifiable. The
photo is the only image taken of the four bombers together on 7/7.
Controversially, no other CCTV images, either still or moving have ever
been released. In an interesting twist, the photo is timed at four
seconds before 7.22 am, which would have given the men only three
minutes to walk up the stairs at Luton, buy their tickets, and move to
the platform.
3. Piss Christ
Andres Serrano is an American photographer who has become notorious
for using feces, corpses, and bodily fluids in his work. Serrano was
raised in a strict Roman Catholic family and is half Honduran, half
Afro-Cuban. In 1987, he created a photograph titled Piss Christ. The
image depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a glass of the
artist’s urine. The photograph was part of a series of pictures that
show classical statuettes submerged in various fluids, including milk,
blood, and urine. Serrano received $15,000 for the picture, which was
provided by the United States sponsored National Endowment for the Arts.
In 1989, the image was displayed for the first time and the event
caused a massive scandal. People became outraged over the picture and
it was alleged that the U.S. government funding of Piss Christ violated
separation of church and state.
Andres Serrano received death threats over the controversy and lost
public grants. He responded by saying that the picture was not intended
to denounce religion, but alludes to a perceived commercializing or
cheapening of Christian icons in contemporary culture. Supporters of
the picture have argued that it is an issue of freedom of speech. On
the contrary, others feel it is their duty to destroy the image if
displayed in a museum. In 1997, a retrospective of Serrano’s work was
featured at the National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne. During the
show, two teenagers attacked Piss Christ with a hammer. On April 17,
2011, a print of Piss Christ was vandalized “beyond repair” by Christian
protesters while on display in Avignon, France.
2. Depiction of Muhammad
This entry is not a specific photograph, but rather the overall
depiction of Muhammad. On September 30, 2005, the Danish newspaper
Jyllands-Posten published 12 editorial (political) cartoons that
depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad in various situations. The
headline of the cartoons read: “Muhammeds ansigt” (The face of
Muhammad). The cartoons were drawn by 12 professional cartoonists in
Denmark, most of who regularly worked for the newspaper. After the
cartoons were published, Islamic protests erupted across the Muslim
world with more than 100 reported deaths. The Danish embassy in
Pakistan was bombed and embassies in Syria, Lebanon, and Iran were fire
bombed. Muslims stormed European buildings and burned the Danish,
Dutch, Norwegian, French, and German flags in Gaza City.
The newspaper announced that the cartoons were an attempt to
contribute to the debate regarding criticism of Islam and
self-censorship. Further examples of the drawings were reprinted in
newspapers in more than 50 countries, which further deepened the
controversy. Critics of the cartoons have described them as racist and
hurtful to the Muslim faith. Supporters claim the cartoons illustrate
an important issue of terrorism and are a legitimate exercise of free
speech. Many people in the Western world feel that Muslims were not
targeted in a way different from other religions, since unflattering
cartoons about Jesus and Gautama Buddha are often published.
The entire issue was covered in two separate episodes of South Park,
which is notorious for depictions of Jesus. Apparently, Comedy Central
has been hesitant to allow images of Muhammad to be shown on the network
since the riots and threats generated from the controversial cartoons.
After Muhammad was heavily featured in the South Park episode 200,
creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone received death threats from the
Revolution Muslim organization. Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh
Rasmussen has described the Muhammad cartoon controversy as Denmark’s
worst international crisis since World War II.
1. Brooke Shields
The full image will not be included, only a cropped version. Garry
Gross was an American fashion photographer who specialized in dog
portraiture. In 1975, he took a collection of pictures that would
become the most controversial in history. The photographs show a
ten-year-old Brooke Shields nude. She is standing and sitting in a
bathtub, wearing makeup, and covered in oil. The pictures were taken
with the consent of her mother, Teri Shields. At the time, Garry Gross
was working on a project titled The Woman in the Child, in which he
wanted to reveal the femininity of prepubescent girls by comparing them
to adult women. The series was first published in the magazine Little
Women, and then in Sugar and Spice, which is a Playboy Press
publication.
In 1981, Brooke Shields attempted to prevent further use of the
photographs, but a U.S. Court ruled that she was bound by the terms of
the contract and more surprisingly that the images did not breach child
pornography laws. In 1992, American artist Richard Prince, who is
famous for his reproduction work, purchased the rights to the pictures.
He recreated the picture and called it “Spiritual America.” In 1999,
Prince’s version sold for $151,000. Three years ago the print was
removed from the Tate Modern gallery in London, England. In response
Gary Gross said: “The photo has been infamous from the day I took it as I
intended it to be.” He was disappointed by the removal, but not
surprised by the Tate’s decision. In 2002, a similar controversy
erupted in London over a picture taken by Swiss artist Annelies Strba.
source : http://listverse.com/2012/02/10/10-controversial-pictures/
0 Komentar untuk "Top 10 Controversial Pictures"